Reaction Time and Elasticity Interactions before a Top Set Is Fixed
Abstract
The question concerns reaction-time by elasticity interactions in simulated margin. The secondary ordinary least squares analysis contains 10,000 observations and uses HC3 covariance. The coefficient on tau1:g1 is 0.0068, with a 95 percent interval from 0.0063 to 0.0074. Reaction-time interactions with elasticity examine context in the stability surface. Input-uncertain top-group selection would additionally need a population of plausible driving conditions and a retained object. The interaction fit does not provide those choices. A later design comparison should directly check candidates near preference or feasibility boundaries on independent simulation evidence. The estimates describe the released collection and its conditioning set. No new data collection, simulator experiment, or deployment-policy evaluation is claimed.
References
H. Xiao and S. Gao, “Simulation Budget Allocation for Selecting the Top-m Designs with Input Uncertainty,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 3127–3134, 2018.
S. Gao, H. Xiao, E. Zhou, and W. Chen, “Optimal Computing Budget Allocation with Input Uncertainty,” Proceedings of the 2016 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 839–846, 2016.
Vadim Arzamasov. Electrical Grid Stability Simulated Data . UCI Machine Learning Repository, 2018. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.24432/C5PG66.
White, Halbert. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica, vol. 48, no. 4, 1980, pp. 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934.
Cameron, A. Colin, and Douglas L. Miller. “A Practitioner’s Guide to Cluster-Robust Inference.” Journal of Human Resources, vol. 50, no. 2, 2015, pp. 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317.
Rasmussen, Carl Edward, and Christopher K. I. Williams. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. MIT Press, 2006. https://gaussianprocess.org/gpml/.
Ankenman, Bruce, Barry L. Nelson, and Jeremy Staum. “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling.” Operations Research, vol. 58, no. 2, 2010, pp. 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1090.0754.
Kim, Seong-Hee, and Barry L. Nelson. “A Fully Sequential Procedure for Indifference-Zone Selection in Simulation.” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 11, no. 3, 2001, pp. 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1145/502109.502111.
Frazier, Peter I., Warren B. Powell, and Savas Dayanik. “A Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Sequential Information Collection.” SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 47, no. 5, 2008, pp. 2410–2439. https://doi.org/10.1137/070693424.
Bertsimas, Dimitris, and Melvyn Sim. “The Price of Robustness.” Operations Research, vol. 52, no. 1, 2004, pp. 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1030.0065.